linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5.3-rc2] Bluetooth: hci_uart: check for missing tty operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Vladis Dronov <vdronov@...hat.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.3-rc2] Bluetooth: hci_uart: check for missing tty
 operations

Hello, Greg, all,

I've just double-checked your backports, indeed, they are fine.

Check for operations is not added for protocols which does not
use these operations. Thanks!

Best regards,
Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | The Core Kernel | Senior Software Engineer

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>
> To: "Vladis Dronov" <vdronov@...hat.com>
> Cc: "Sasha Levin" <sashal@...nel.org>, "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:06:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.3-rc2] Bluetooth: hci_uart: check for missing tty operations
> 
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:55:55AM -0400, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> > Thank you, Greg!
> > 
> > I've just noticed the patch landed in the upstream and was going to start
> > stable
> > backports, but it appeared you've already done this.
> 
> Verifying that I got the 4.4.y and 4.9.y and 4.14.y backports done
> properly would be good, as I took a guess at them :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h