[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801144814.GC31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:48:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] tracehook: Provide TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling for KVM
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:32:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> +/**
> + * tracehook_handle_notify_resume - Notify resume handling for virt
> + *
> + * Called with interrupts and preemption enabled from VMENTER/EXIT.
> + */
> +void tracehook_handle_notify_resume(void)
> +{
> + local_irq_disable();
> + while (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + tracehook_notify_resume(NULL);
> + local_irq_disable();
> + }
> + local_irq_enable();
I'm confused by the IRQ state swizzling here, what is it doing?
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracehook_handle_notify_resume);
> +#endif
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists