[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801151144.GZ23480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:11:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Darren Hart (VMware)" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Roman Kiryanov <rkir@...gle.com>,
Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 55/57] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: Remove
dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq()
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We don't need dev_err() messages when platform_get_irq() fails now that
> platform_get_irq() prints an error message itself when something goes
> wrong. Let's remove these prints with a simple semantic patch.
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression ret;
> struct platform_device *E;
> @@
>
> ret =
> (
> platform_get_irq(E, ...)
> |
> platform_get_irq_byname(E, ...)
> );
>
> if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
> {
> (
> -if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -{ ...
> -dev_err(...);
> -... }
> |
> ...
> -dev_err(...);
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> While we're here, remove braces on if statements that only have one
> statement (manually).
All 4 pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
P.S. Please, consider Cc'ing PDx86 mailing list next time for contribution.
Otherwise it misses our patchwork.
>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: "Darren Hart (VMware)" <dvhart@...radead.org>
> Cc: Roman Kiryanov <rkir@...gle.com>
> Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Please apply directly to subsystem trees
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> index d9542c661ddc..4f3f30152a27 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002_vgpio.c
> @@ -166,10 +166,8 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Error getting IRQ: %d\n", irq);
> + if (irq < 0)
> return irq;
> - }
>
> chip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!chip)
> --
> Sent by a computer through tubes
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists