lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801163453.GA26588@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 18:34:53 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, john.hubbard@...il.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to
 put_user_pages_dirty_lock()

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:19:06AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Sadly usnic does not use the core rdma umem abstraction but open codes
> an old version of it.
> 
> In this version each sge in the sgl is exactly one page. See
> usnic_uiom_get_pages - so I think this loop is not a bug?

Actually, yes - I think we are fine given that we pass in the number
of elements.  Thus merging by iommus won't affect the list.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ