[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908012010020.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 20:12:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 6/7] fs/jbd2: Make state lock a spinlock
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-08-19 03:01:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
> > readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
> > and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.
> >
>
> Just a heads up that I didn't miss this patch. Just it has some bugs and I
> figured that rather than explaining to you subtleties of jh lifetime it is
> easier to fix up the problems myself since you're probably not keen on
> becoming jbd2 developer ;)... which was more complex than I thought so I'm
> not completely done yet. Hopefuly tomorrow.
I'm curious where I was too naive :)
Thanks for having a look!
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists