linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: call vtu_getnext directly in vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  1 Aug 2019 14:36:36 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: call vtu_getnext directly in vlan_del

Wrapping mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext makes the code less easy to read.
Explicit the call to mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext in _mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_del
and the return value expected by switchdev in case of software VLANs.

At the same time, rename the helper using an old underscore convention.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 42ab57dbc790..50a6dbcc669c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -1671,18 +1671,27 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
 }
 
-static int _mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_del(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
-				    int port, u16 vid)
+static int mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
+				     int port, u16 vid)
 {
 	struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry vlan;
 	int i, err;
 
-	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(chip, vid, &vlan, false);
+	if (!vid)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	vlan.vid = vid - 1;
+	vlan.valid = false;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(chip, &vlan);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	/* Tell switchdev if this VLAN is handled in software */
-	if (vlan.member[port] == MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_DATA_MEMBER_TAG_NON_MEMBER)
+	/* If the VLAN doesn't exist in hardware or the port isn't a member,
+	 * tell switchdev that this VLAN is likely handled in software.
+	 */
+	if (vlan.vid != vid || !vlan.valid ||
+	    vlan.member[port] == MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_DATA_MEMBER_TAG_NON_MEMBER)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	vlan.member[port] = MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_DATA_MEMBER_TAG_NON_MEMBER;
@@ -1721,7 +1730,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 		goto unlock;
 
 	for (vid = vlan->vid_begin; vid <= vlan->vid_end; ++vid) {
-		err = _mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_del(chip, port, vid);
+		err = mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave(chip, port, vid);
 		if (err)
 			goto unlock;
 
-- 
2.22.0