[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801194947.GA12033@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:49:48 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jing.lin@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm: Add support for MOVDIR64B instruction
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:43:48PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > +static inline void movdir64b(void *dst, const void *src)
> > +{
> > + /* movdir64b [rdx], rax */
> > + asm volatile(".byte 0x66, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf8, 0x02"
> > + : "=m" (*(char *)dst)
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > + : "d" (src), "a" (dst));
> > +}
>
> Probably needs fake 64-byte type, so that compiler knows what is dirty.
Would that be something like this?
static inline void movdir64b(void *dst, const void *src)
{
struct dstbytes {
char pad[64];
};
/* movdir64b [rdx], rax */
asm volatile(".byte 0x66, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf8, 0x02"
: "=m" (*(struct dstbytes *)dst)
: "d" (src), "a" (dst));
}
Or did you have something else in mind?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists