[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802121555.dl6rpjphgaxdvcke@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:15:55 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Cc: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] serial: 8250: Don't check for mctrl_gpio_init()
returning -ENOSYS
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:04:11AM +0000, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>
> Now that the mctrl_gpio code returns NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS)
> if CONFIG_GPIOLIB is disabled, we can safely remove this check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
@greg: This patch doesn't depend on patch 2; ditto for patch 3. So only
taking patches 1, 3 and 4 should be fine. This way Frieder's v4 only
have to care for patch 2. (Assuming noone objects to 1, 3 and 4 of
course.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists