[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802122003.GQ12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:50:03 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/40] soundwire: cadence_master: handle multiple
status reports per Slave
On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> When a Slave reports multiple status in the sticky bits, find the
> latest configuration from the mirror of the PING frame status and
> update the status directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> index 889fa2cd49ae..25d5c7267c15 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c
> @@ -643,13 +643,35 @@ static int cdns_update_slave_status(struct sdw_cdns *cdns,
>
> /* first check if Slave reported multiple status */
> if (set_status > 1) {
> + u32 val;
> +
> dev_warn_ratelimited(cdns->dev,
> - "Slave reported multiple Status: %d\n",
> - mask);
> - /*
> - * TODO: we need to reread the status here by
> - * issuing a PING cmd
> - */
> + "Slave %d reported multiple Status: %d\n",
> + i, mask);
> +
> + /* re-check latest status extracted from PING commands */
> + val = cdns_readl(cdns, CDNS_MCP_SLAVE_STAT);
> + val >>= (i * 2);
> +
> + switch (val & 0x3) {
> + case 0:
why not case CDNS_MCP_SLAVE_INTSTAT_NPRESENT:
> + status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED;
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_ALERT;
> + break;
> + default:
> + status[i] = SDW_SLAVE_RESERVED;
> + break;
> + }
we have same logic in the code block preceding this, maybe good idea to
write a helper and use for both
Also IIRC we can have multiple status set right?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists