linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fork: extend clone3() to support CLONE_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190802130214.l6vporvni7nnbnif@brauner.io>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:02:35 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     Adrian Reber <areber@...hat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Radostin Stoyanov <rstoyanov1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fork: extend clone3() to support CLONE_SET_TID

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/02, Adrian Reber wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 07:41:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > But the main question is how it can really help if ns->level > 0, unlikely
> > > CRIU will ever need to clone the process with the same pid_nr == set_tid
> > > in the ns->parent chain.
> >
> > Not sure I understand what you mean. For CRIU only the PID in the PID
> > namespace is relevant.
> 
> If it runs "inside" this namespace. But in this case alloc_pid() should
> use nr == set_tid only once in the main loop, when i == ns->level.
> 
> It doesn't need to have the same pid_nr in the parent pid namespace.
> 
> And in fact we should not allow criu (or anything else) to control the child's
> pid_nr in the parent(s) namespace.

This should definitely not be possible!

> 
> Right?
> 
> > > So may be kernel_clone_args->set_tid should be pid_t __user *set_tid_array?
> > > Or I missed something ?
> >
> > Not sure why and how an array would be needed. Could you give me some
> > more details why you think this is needed.
> 
> IIURC, criu can restore the process tree along with nested pid namespaces.

Hm, I'm not a fan of this array approach...

> 
> how can this patch help in this case?
> 
> But again, perhaps I missed something. I forgot everything about criu.
> 
> Oleg.
>