[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9684b15d-39a4-2c1b-3269-466ceb37ef90@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:43:36 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: selftests: Enable ucall and dirty_log_test on
s390x
On 02/08/19 15:39, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 31.07.19 17:15, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Implement the ucall() interface on s390x to be able to use the
>> dirty_log_test KVM selftest on s390x, too.
>>
>> v3:
>> - Fix compilation issue on aarch64 (thanks to Andrew for testing it!)
>> - Added Reviewed-bys
>>
>> v2:
>> - Split up ucall.c into architecture specific files
>> - Removed some #ifdef __s390x__ in the dirty_log patch
>>
>> Thomas Huth (3):
>> KVM: selftests: Split ucall.c into architecture specific files
>> KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x
>> KVM: selftests: Enable dirty_log_test on s390x
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 9 +-
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 61 ++++++-
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 8 +-
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 112 +++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c | 56 +++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c | 157 ------------------
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c | 56 +++++++
>> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 6 +-
>> 8 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c
>> delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c
>>
>
> Paolo, I guess you do not mind if I carry patch 1 also via the s390x tree?
Sure,
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists