lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8baf1c39-ad04-5cd6-bc67-341e7411db16@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:11:09 +0200
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
CC:     <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <crazyt2019+lml@...il.com>, <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: allow module init if TPM is inactive or
 deactivated

On 8/2/2019 5:34 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 8/2/2019 5:30 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 2019-08-02 17:07:33, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>> Commit c78719203fc6 ("KEYS: trusted: allow trusted.ko to initialize 
>>> w/o a
>>> TPM") allows the trusted module to be loaded even a TPM is not found to
>>                                                     ^ if
>>
>>> avoid module dependency problems.
>>>
>>> However, trusted module initialization can still fail if the TPM is
>>> inactive or deactivated. This patch ignores tpm_get_random() errors in
>>> init_digests() and returns -EFAULT in pcrlock() if the TPM didn't return
>>> random data.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>>
>> The code changes look correct to me.
>>
>>    Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
>>
>> For whoever takes this patch through their tree, I think that adding the
>> following Fixes tag would be useful (as well as cc'ing stable):
>>
>>    Fixes: 240730437deb ("KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip 
>> structure...")
>>
>> I think it is also worth leaving a short note, in the commit message,
>> for backporters that commit 782779b60faa ("tpm: Actually fail on TPM
>> errors during "get random"") should be included with any backports of
>> this patch.
> 
> Right, thanks. I wait for Jarkko's comments and I add both the Fixes tag
> and the short note in the next version of the patch.

Uhm, I was thinking that maybe it is not necessary to mention commit
782779b60faa. This patch would still return 0 even if that commit is not
backported (TPM_ERR_DISABLED < TPM_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE).

Roberto

-- 
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ