[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802105406.53cd9977@x1.home>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:54:06 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, dima@...sta.com,
tmurphy@...sta.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/15] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup get_valid_domain_for_dev()
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:17:45 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. I will try to find a machine with a
> pcie-to-pci bridge and get this issue fixed. I will update you
> later.
Further debug below...
> On 8/2/19 9:30 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > DMAR: No ATSR found
> > DMAR: dmar0: Using Queued invalidation
> > DMAR: dmar1: Using Queued invalidation
> > pci 0000:00:00.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:01.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:02.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:16.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1a.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1b.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.5: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.6: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.7: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1d.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1f.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1f.2: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1f.3: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:01:00.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:01:00.1: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:03:00.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > pci 0000:04:00.0: DMAR: Software identity mapping
> > DMAR: Setting RMRR:
> > pci 0000:00:02.0: DMAR: Setting identity map [0xbf800000 - 0xcf9fffff]
> > pci 0000:00:1a.0: DMAR: Setting identity map [0xbe8d1000 - 0xbe8dffff]
> > pci 0000:00:1d.0: DMAR: Setting identity map [0xbe8d1000 - 0xbe8dffff]
> > DMAR: Prepare 0-16MiB unity mapping for LPC
> > pci 0000:00:1f.0: DMAR: Setting identity map [0x0 - 0xffffff]
> > pci 0000:00:00.0: Adding to iommu group 0
> > pci 0000:00:00.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:01.0: Adding to iommu group 1
> > pci 0000:00:01.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:02.0: Adding to iommu group 2
> > pci 0000:00:02.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:16.0: Adding to iommu group 3
> > pci 0000:00:16.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1a.0: Adding to iommu group 4
> > pci 0000:00:1a.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1b.0: Adding to iommu group 5
> > pci 0000:00:1b.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.0: Adding to iommu group 6
> > pci 0000:00:1c.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.5: Adding to iommu group 7
> > pci 0000:00:1c.5: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.6: Adding to iommu group 8
> > pci 0000:00:1c.6: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1c.7: Adding to iommu group 9
Note that group 9 contains device 00:1c.7
> > pci 0000:00:1c.7: Using iommu direct mapping
I'm booted with iommu=pt, so the domain type is IOMMU_DOMAIN_PT
> > pci 0000:00:1d.0: Adding to iommu group 10
> > pci 0000:00:1d.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1f.0: Adding to iommu group 11
> > pci 0000:00:1f.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:00:1f.2: Adding to iommu group 11
> > pci 0000:00:1f.3: Adding to iommu group 11
> > pci 0000:01:00.0: Adding to iommu group 1
> > pci 0000:01:00.1: Adding to iommu group 1
> > pci 0000:03:00.0: Adding to iommu group 12
> > pci 0000:03:00.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:04:00.0: Adding to iommu group 13
> > pci 0000:04:00.0: Using iommu direct mapping
> > pci 0000:05:00.0: Adding to iommu group 9
05:00.0 is downstream of 00:1c.7 and in the same group. As above, the
domain is type IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY, so we take the following branch:
} else {
if (device_def_domain_type(dev) == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) {
Default domain type is IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA because of the code block in
device_def_domain_type() handling bridges to conventional PCI and
conventional PCI endpoints.
ret = iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev(dev);
This fails in request_default_domain_for_dev() because there's more
than one device in the group.
if (ret) {
dmar_domain->flags |= DOMAIN_FLAG_LOSE_CHILDREN;
if (!get_private_domain_for_dev(dev)) {
With this commit, this now returns NULL because find_domain() does find
a domain, the same one we found before this code block.
dev_warn(dev,
"Failed to get a private domain.\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
So the key factors are that I'm booting with iommu=pt and I have a
PCIe-to-PCI bridge grouped with its parent root port. The bridge
wants an IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA, but the group domain is already of type
IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY. A temporary workaround is to not use
passthrough mode, but this is a regression versus previous kernels.
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists