[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802170041.GW12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:30:41 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/40] soundwire: bus: improve dynamic debug comments
for enumeration
On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> update comments to provide better understanding of enumeration flows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> index bca378806d00..2354675ef104 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> @@ -483,7 +483,8 @@ static int sdw_assign_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave)
>
> ret = sdw_write(slave, SDW_SCP_DEVNUMBER, dev_num);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&slave->dev, "Program device_num failed: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(&slave->dev, "Program device_num %d failed: %d\n",
> + dev_num, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -540,6 +541,7 @@ static int sdw_program_device_num(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> do {
> ret = sdw_transfer(bus, &msg);
> if (ret == -ENODATA) { /* end of device id reads */
> + dev_dbg(bus->dev, "No more devices to enumerate\n");
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> @@ -982,6 +984,7 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> if (status[0] == SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED) {
> + dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave attached, programming device number\n");
This should be debug level
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists