lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <314b5572-4113-d5c5-5956-1a55555a573c@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:33:18 -0700
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <jason@...edaemon.net>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <stefan@...er.ch>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <jckuo@...dia.com>,
        <josephl@...dia.com>, <talho@...dia.com>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mperttunen@...dia.com>, <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/20] clk: tegra: clk-periph: Add save and restore
 support


On 8/2/19 5:38 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 02.08.2019 2:49, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> On 8/1/19 4:19 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>> On 8/1/19 2:30 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>> On 8/1/19 1:54 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 01.08.2019 23:31, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>> On 8/1/19 1:17 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> 01.08.2019 22:42, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>> On 8/1/19 12:00 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 01.08.2019 20:58, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/19 4:09 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/19 3:44 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 31.07.2019 12:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 31.07.2019 3:20, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch implements save and restore context for peripheral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clock ops, peripheral gate clock ops, sdmmc mux clock ops, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peripheral clock ops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During system suspend, core power goes off and looses the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Tegra CAR controller registers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So during suspend entry clock and reset state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peripherals is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and on resume they are restored to have clocks back to same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state as before suspend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c | 33
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c  | 34
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c       | 37
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/clk/tegra/clk-sdmmc-mux.c    | 28
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h              | 6 ++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       5 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index c088e7a280df..21b24530fa00 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -60,11 +60,44 @@ tegra_clk_periph_fixed_recalc_rate(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw *hw,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           return (unsigned long)rate;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       +static int tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph_fixed *fixed =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_tegra_clk_periph_fixed(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    u32 mask = 1 << (fixed->num % 32);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    fixed->enb_ctx = readl_relaxed(fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_reg) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +             mask;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    fixed->rst_ctx = readl_relaxed(fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->rst_reg) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +             mask;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void tegra_clk_periph_fixed_restore_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph_fixed *fixed =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_tegra_clk_periph_fixed(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    u32 mask = 1 << (fixed->num % 32);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (fixed->enb_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_set_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_clr_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    udelay(2);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!fixed->rst_ctx) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        udelay(5); /* reset propogation delay */
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->rst_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       static const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_periph_fixed_ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .is_enabled = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_is_enabled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .enable = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_enable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .disable = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_disable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .recalc_rate = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_recalc_rate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    .save_context = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    .restore_context =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_restore_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       };
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         struct clk *tegra_clk_register_periph_fixed(const char
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 4b31beefc9fc..6ba5b08e0787 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(periph_ref_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         #define read_rst(gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           readl_relaxed(gate->clk_base + (gate->regs->rst_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define write_rst_set(val, gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    writel_relaxed(val, gate->clk_base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (gate->regs->rst_set_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       #define write_rst_clr(val, gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           writel_relaxed(val, gate->clk_base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (gate->regs->rst_clr_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       @@ -110,10 +112,42 @@ static void
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph_disable(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&periph_ref_lock, flags);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       +static int clk_periph_gate_save_context(struct clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph_gate *gate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_clk_periph_gate(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    gate->clk_state_ctx = read_enb(gate) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> periph_clk_to_bit(gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    gate->rst_state_ctx = read_rst(gate) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> periph_clk_to_bit(gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void clk_periph_gate_restore_context(struct clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph_gate *gate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_clk_periph_gate(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (gate->clk_state_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_enb_set(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_enb_clr(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    udelay(5);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!(gate->flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET) &&
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        !(gate->flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_MANUAL_RESET)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        if (gate->rst_state_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_rst_set(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_rst_clr(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops = {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .is_enabled = clk_periph_is_enabled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .enable = clk_periph_enable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           .disable = clk_periph_disable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    .save_context = clk_periph_gate_save_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    .restore_context = clk_periph_gate_restore_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       };
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         struct clk *tegra_clk_register_periph_gate(const
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> char *name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 58437da25156..06fb62955768 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -99,6 +99,37 @@ static void clk_periph_disable(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           gate_ops->disable(gate_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       +static int clk_periph_save_context(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph *periph = to_clk_periph(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    const struct clk_ops *gate_ops = periph->gate_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &periph->gate.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!(periph->gate.flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_GATE))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +        gate_ops->save_context(gate_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    periph->parent_ctx = clk_periph_get_parent(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void clk_periph_restore_context(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct tegra_clk_periph *periph = to_clk_periph(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    const struct clk_ops *gate_ops = periph->gate_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &periph->gate.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    const struct clk_ops *div_ops = periph->div_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    struct clk_hw *div_hw = &periph->divider.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    clk_periph_set_parent(hw, periph->parent_ctx);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!(periph->gate.flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_DIV))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + div_ops->restore_context(div_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please point to where the divider's save_context()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I can't see it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, I now see that there is no need to save the dividers context
>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk itself has enough info that is needed for the context's
>>>>>>>>>>>> restoring
>>>>>>>>>>>> (like I pointed in the review to v6).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like you could also implement a new
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw_get_parent_index()
>>>>>>>>>>>> generic helper to get the index instead of storing it manually.
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph_get_parent basically invokes existing clk_mux_ops
>>>>>>>>>>> get_parent() which is then saved in tegra_clk_periph.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All existing drivers are using directly get_parent() from clk_mux
>>>>>>>>>>> which actually gets index from the register read.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To have this more generic w.r.t save/restore context point of
>>>>>>>>>>> view,
>>>>>>>>>>> probably instead of implementing new get_parent_index helper,
>>>>>>>>>>> I think
>>>>>>>>>>> its better to implement save_context and restore_context to
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux_ops along with creating parent_index field into
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux to
>>>>>>>>>>> cache index during set_parent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So we just need to invoke mux_ops save_context and
>>>>>>>>>>> restore_context.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I hope its ok to add save/restore context to clk_mux_ops to be
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> generic w.r.t save/restore context rather than get_parent_index
>>>>>>>>>> API.
>>>>>>>>>> Please confirm if you agree.
>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I see that there is a 'restoring'
>>>>>>>>> helper for
>>>>>>>>> the generic clk_gate, seems something similar could be done for the
>>>>>>>>> clk_mux. And looks like anyway you'll need to associate the parent
>>>>>>>>> clock
>>>>>>>>> with the hw index in order to restore the muxing.
>>>>>>>> by 'restoring' helper for generic clk_gate, are you referring to
>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context API?
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context is API that's any clk drivers can use for
>>>>>>>> clk_gate operation restore for custom gate clk_ops.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But clk-periph is directly using generic clk_mux ops from clk_mux
>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>> think we should add .restore_context to clk_mux_ops and then during
>>>>>>>> clk-periph restore need to invoke mux_ops->restore_context.
>>>>>>> I'm not sure whether it will be good for every driver that uses
>>>>>>> generic
>>>>>>> clk_mux ops. Should be more flexible to have a generic helper
>>>>>>> function
>>>>>>> that any driver could use in order to restore the clock's parent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The clk-periph restoring also includes case of combining divider and
>>>>>>> parent restoring, so generic helper could be useful in that case
>>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It also looks like you could actually use the
>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context()
>>>>>>> instead of manually saving the clock's enable-state, couldn't you?
>>>>>> ok for clk_mux, can add generic clk_mux_restore_context API rather
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> using restore_context in clk_ops and will invoke that during
>>>>>> clk_periph
>>>>>> restore.
>>>>>>
>> digging thru looks like for clk_periph source restore instead of
>> clk_mux_restore_context, i can directly do clk_hw_get_parent and
>> clk_set_parent with mux_hw as they invoke mux_ops get/set parent anyway.
>> Will do this for periph clk mux
>>>>>> Reg clk_gate, looks like we cant use generic clk_gate_restore_context
>>>>>> for clk-periph as it calls enable/disable callbacks and
>>>>>> clk_periph_enable/disable in clk-periph-gate also updated refcnt and
>>>>>> depending on that actual enable/disable is set.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> During suspend, peripherals that are already enabled have their
>>>>>> refcnt >
>>>>>> 1, so they dont go thru enable/disable on restore if we use same
>>>>>> enable/disable callback.
>>>>> Looks like you could just decrement the gate's enable_refcnt on
>>>>> save_context, wouldn't that work?
>>>>>
>>> gate->enable_refcnt is within clk-periph-gate which gets updated when
>>> enable/disable callbacks get execute thru clk_core_enable/disable.
>>> But actual enable_count used in clk_gate_restore_context is the one
>>> which gets updated with in the clk core enable/disable functions which
>>> invokes these callbacks. Depending on this enable_count in clk core it
>>> invokes enable/disable.
>>>
>>> So, this will cause mismatch if we handle refcnt during save/restore
>>> of tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops and also enable/disable thru this
>>> clk_gate_restore_context is based on enable_count from clk core.
>>>
>>>>>> Also to align exact reset state along with CLK (like for case where
>>>>>> CLK
>>>>>> is enabled but peripheral might be in reset state), implemented
>>>>>> save/restore in tegra specific tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops
>>>>> I'm wondering whether instead of saving/restoring reset-state of every
>>>>> clock, you could simply save/restore the whole RST_DEV_x_SET register.
>>>>> Couldn't you?
>>>> Thats what I was doing in first version of patch. But later as we
>>>> moved to use clk_save_context and clk_restore_context, peripheral
>>>> clk_hw RST & CLK enables happen thru its corresponding save/restore
>>>> after source restore
>>>
>>> Also, to align both CLK & RST to the exact state of register, doing
>>> save/restore in tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops and invoking this after
>>> source restore for peripheral clock, seems cleaner to avoid any
>>> misconfiguration b/w rst & clk settings.
>>>
> It looks to me that it is very wasteful to store/restore each individual
> gate and reset state, also given that some of them are shared. I think
> that the gates and resets should be restored separately for the
> peripherals by a custom tegra_clk_save/restore_periph_gates/resets().
clk_periph_fixed_disable just disables clock only without deasserting 
the corresponding peripheral.

corresponding peripheral drivers can also issue reset assert/deassert 
thru reset_control_assert/deassert.

So, we will not get the actual state of clk and rst unless we read and 
save state of reset and clock separately during save_context.

Currently patch is already using custom 
tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save/restore_context for corresponding clk_ops.
Are you suggesting to do save and restore of complete CLK_ENB/RST_DEV 
register settings instead of individual peripheral bits?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ