[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190802204131.pcb73zq7gllyy3ul@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 23:41:42 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] tpm: add driver for cr50 on SPI
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 02:00:06PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> Is it a common pattern to add config options that are not useful on their
> own? When would I ever enable TCG_CR50 without also enabling TCG_CR50_SPI?
> Why can't you just use TCG_CR50_SPI for everything?
Agreed. If the kernel only has the spi driver, we only want option for
that.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists