[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73cd521b-782c-7fb2-d904-ae8b07927d47@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 00:15:46 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, stefan@...er.ch, mark.rutland@....com
Cc: pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
jckuo@...dia.com, josephl@...dia.com, talho@...dia.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mperttunen@...dia.com, spatra@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/20] clk: tegra: clk-periph: Add save and restore
support
02.08.2019 23:32, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>
> On 8/2/19 1:17 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 02.08.2019 23:13, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> 02.08.2019 21:33, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> On 8/2/19 5:38 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> 02.08.2019 2:49, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>> On 8/1/19 4:19 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/1/19 2:30 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/1/19 1:54 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 01.08.2019 23:31, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/1/19 1:17 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 01.08.2019 22:42, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/1/19 12:00 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 01.08.2019 20:58, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/19 4:09 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/19 3:44 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 31.07.2019 12:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 31.07.2019 3:20, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch implements save and restore context for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peripheral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clock ops, peripheral gate clock ops, sdmmc mux clock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ops, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peripheral clock ops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During system suspend, core power goes off and looses the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Tegra CAR controller registers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So during suspend entry clock and reset state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peripherals is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and on resume they are restored to have clocks back to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state as before suspend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <skomatineni@...dia.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c | 33
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c | 34
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c | 37
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-sdmmc-mux.c | 28
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk.h | 6 ++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index c088e7a280df..21b24530fa00 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-fixed.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -60,11 +60,44 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_recalc_rate(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw *hw,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return (unsigned long)rate;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static int
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph_fixed *fixed =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_tegra_clk_periph_fixed(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + u32 mask = 1 << (fixed->num % 32);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + fixed->enb_ctx = readl_relaxed(fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_reg) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + mask;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + fixed->rst_ctx = readl_relaxed(fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->rst_reg) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + mask;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_restore_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph_fixed *fixed =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_tegra_clk_periph_fixed(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + u32 mask = 1 << (fixed->num % 32);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (fixed->enb_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_set_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->enb_clr_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + udelay(2);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!fixed->rst_ctx) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + udelay(5); /* reset propogation delay */
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + writel_relaxed(mask, fixed->base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed->regs->rst_reg);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> static const struct clk_ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .is_enabled =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_is_enabled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .enable = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_enable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .disable = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_disable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .recalc_rate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_recalc_rate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + .save_context = tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + .restore_context =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_restore_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> struct clk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *tegra_clk_register_periph_fixed(const
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> char
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 4b31beefc9fc..6ba5b08e0787 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph-gate.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ static
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DEFINE_SPINLOCK(periph_ref_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #define read_rst(gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readl_relaxed(gate->clk_base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (gate->regs->rst_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define write_rst_set(val, gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + writel_relaxed(val, gate->clk_base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (gate->regs->rst_set_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #define write_rst_clr(val, gate) \
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writel_relaxed(val, gate->clk_base +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (gate->regs->rst_clr_reg))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -110,10 +112,42 @@ static void
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph_disable(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&periph_ref_lock, flags);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static int clk_periph_gate_save_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph_gate *gate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_clk_periph_gate(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + gate->clk_state_ctx = read_enb(gate) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> periph_clk_to_bit(gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + gate->rst_state_ctx = read_rst(gate) &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> periph_clk_to_bit(gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void clk_periph_gate_restore_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph_gate *gate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to_clk_periph_gate(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (gate->clk_state_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_enb_set(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_enb_clr(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + udelay(5);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!(gate->flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_RESET) &&
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + !(gate->flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_MANUAL_RESET)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (gate->rst_state_ctx)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_rst_set(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + write_rst_clr(periph_clk_to_bit(gate), gate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> const struct clk_ops tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops = {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .is_enabled = clk_periph_is_enabled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .enable = clk_periph_enable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .disable = clk_periph_disable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + .save_context = clk_periph_gate_save_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + .restore_context = clk_periph_gate_restore_context,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> struct clk *tegra_clk_register_periph_gate(const
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> char *name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 58437da25156..06fb62955768 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-periph.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -99,6 +99,37 @@ static void clk_periph_disable(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gate_ops->disable(gate_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static int clk_periph_save_context(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph *periph = to_clk_periph(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + const struct clk_ops *gate_ops = periph->gate_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &periph->gate.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!(periph->gate.flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_GATE))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + gate_ops->save_context(gate_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + periph->parent_ctx = clk_periph_get_parent(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void clk_periph_restore_context(struct clk_hw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hw)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct tegra_clk_periph *periph = to_clk_periph(hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + const struct clk_ops *gate_ops = periph->gate_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &periph->gate.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + const struct clk_ops *div_ops = periph->div_ops;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct clk_hw *div_hw = &periph->divider.hw;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + clk_periph_set_parent(hw, periph->parent_ctx);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!(periph->gate.flags & TEGRA_PERIPH_NO_DIV))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + div_ops->restore_context(div_hw);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please point to where the divider's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> save_context()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I can't see it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, I now see that there is no need to save the dividers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk itself has enough info that is needed for the context's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (like I pointed in the review to v6).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like you could also implement a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_hw_get_parent_index()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generic helper to get the index instead of storing it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph_get_parent basically invokes existing clk_mux_ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get_parent() which is then saved in tegra_clk_periph.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All existing drivers are using directly get_parent() from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which actually gets index from the register read.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To have this more generic w.r.t save/restore context
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably instead of implementing new get_parent_index
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> helper,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its better to implement save_context and restore_context to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux_ops along with creating parent_index field into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache index during set_parent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we just need to invoke mux_ops save_context and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore_context.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope its ok to add save/restore context to clk_mux_ops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generic w.r.t save/restore context rather than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get_parent_index
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please confirm if you agree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I see that there is a 'restoring'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> helper for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the generic clk_gate, seems something similar could be done
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux. And looks like anyway you'll need to associate the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> parent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clock
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the hw index in order to restore the muxing.
>>>>>>>>>>>> by 'restoring' helper for generic clk_gate, are you
>>>>>>>>>>>> referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context API?
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context is API that's any clk drivers can
>>>>>>>>>>>> use for
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_gate operation restore for custom gate clk_ops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But clk-periph is directly using generic clk_mux ops from
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux
>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think we should add .restore_context to clk_mux_ops and then
>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk-periph restore need to invoke mux_ops->restore_context.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure whether it will be good for every driver that uses
>>>>>>>>>>> generic
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_mux ops. Should be more flexible to have a generic helper
>>>>>>>>>>> function
>>>>>>>>>>> that any driver could use in order to restore the clock's
>>>>>>>>>>> parent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The clk-periph restoring also includes case of combining divider
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> parent restoring, so generic helper could be useful in that case
>>>>>>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It also looks like you could actually use the
>>>>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context()
>>>>>>>>>>> instead of manually saving the clock's enable-state, couldn't
>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>> ok for clk_mux, can add generic clk_mux_restore_context API
>>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> using restore_context in clk_ops and will invoke that during
>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph
>>>>>>>>>> restore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> digging thru looks like for clk_periph source restore instead of
>>>>>> clk_mux_restore_context, i can directly do clk_hw_get_parent and
>>>>>> clk_set_parent with mux_hw as they invoke mux_ops get/set parent
>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>> Will do this for periph clk mux
>>>>>>>>>> Reg clk_gate, looks like we cant use generic
>>>>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context
>>>>>>>>>> for clk-periph as it calls enable/disable callbacks and
>>>>>>>>>> clk_periph_enable/disable in clk-periph-gate also updated
>>>>>>>>>> refcnt and
>>>>>>>>>> depending on that actual enable/disable is set.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> During suspend, peripherals that are already enabled have their
>>>>>>>>>> refcnt >
>>>>>>>>>> 1, so they dont go thru enable/disable on restore if we use same
>>>>>>>>>> enable/disable callback.
>>>>>>>>> Looks like you could just decrement the gate's enable_refcnt on
>>>>>>>>> save_context, wouldn't that work?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gate->enable_refcnt is within clk-periph-gate which gets updated
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>> enable/disable callbacks get execute thru clk_core_enable/disable.
>>>>>>> But actual enable_count used in clk_gate_restore_context is the one
>>>>>>> which gets updated with in the clk core enable/disable functions
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> invokes these callbacks. Depending on this enable_count in clk
>>>>>>> core it
>>>>>>> invokes enable/disable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, this will cause mismatch if we handle refcnt during save/restore
>>>>>>> of tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops and also enable/disable thru this
>>>>>>> clk_gate_restore_context is based on enable_count from clk core.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also to align exact reset state along with CLK (like for case
>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>> CLK
>>>>>>>>>> is enabled but peripheral might be in reset state), implemented
>>>>>>>>>> save/restore in tegra specific tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops
>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering whether instead of saving/restoring reset-state of
>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>> clock, you could simply save/restore the whole RST_DEV_x_SET
>>>>>>>>> register.
>>>>>>>>> Couldn't you?
>>>>>>>> Thats what I was doing in first version of patch. But later as we
>>>>>>>> moved to use clk_save_context and clk_restore_context, peripheral
>>>>>>>> clk_hw RST & CLK enables happen thru its corresponding save/restore
>>>>>>>> after source restore
>>>>>>> Also, to align both CLK & RST to the exact state of register, doing
>>>>>>> save/restore in tegra_clk_periph_gate_ops and invoking this after
>>>>>>> source restore for peripheral clock, seems cleaner to avoid any
>>>>>>> misconfiguration b/w rst & clk settings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>> It looks to me that it is very wasteful to store/restore each
>>>>> individual
>>>>> gate and reset state, also given that some of them are shared. I think
>>>>> that the gates and resets should be restored separately for the
>>>>> peripherals by a custom tegra_clk_save/restore_periph_gates/resets().
>>>> clk_periph_fixed_disable just disables clock only without deasserting
>>>> the corresponding peripheral.
>>>>
>>>> corresponding peripheral drivers can also issue reset assert/deassert
>>>> thru reset_control_assert/deassert.
>>>>
>>>> So, we will not get the actual state of clk and rst unless we read and
>>>> save state of reset and clock separately during save_context.
>>>>
>>>> Currently patch is already using custom
>>>> tegra_clk_periph_fixed_save/restore_context for corresponding clk_ops.
>>>> Are you suggesting to do save and restore of complete CLK_ENB/RST_DEV
>>>> register settings instead of individual peripheral bits?
>>> Yes, I'm suggesting to do a complete ungate/reset handling of the
>>> devices in a separate function. All enabling/deassertion will be done in
>>> a single hop, hence using 7us delay and four u32 words, which is much
>>> nicer IMHO.
>> Actually six words, three for CLKs and three for RSTs.
>
> OK, So with separate function doing complete register save/restore for
> clk & rst, we can't do this thru clk_ops save/restore as clk_ops
> save_restore happens per peripheral wise. So if we decide to do this,
> then this should be invoked in clk-tegra210 driver suspend/resume.
Yes, per-clock save/restore should be used for setting rate and parent.
The ungating and resetting could be done separately to keep things cleaner.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists