[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98eaa917-8270-ecdc-2420-491ed1c903d8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:17:44 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Radim K <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/19] RISC-V: KVM: Implement VCPU interrupts and
requests handling
On 02/08/19 09:47, Anup Patel wrote:
> + /* VCPU interrupts */
> + unsigned long irqs_pending;
> + unsigned long irqs_pending_mask;
> +
This deserves a comment on the locking policy (none for producer,
vcpu_lock for consumers).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists