linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.9.180 build fails with gcc 9 and 'cleanup_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target …

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190802082820.GA30928@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:28:20 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.9.180 build fails with gcc 9 and 'cleanup_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target …

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:17:04AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. Juni 2019, 14:00:34 CEST schrieb Miguel Ojeda:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:59 PM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > > "manually fixing it up" means "hacked it to pieces" to me, I have no
> > > idea what the end result really was :)
> > > 
> > > If someone wants to send me some patches I can actually apply, that
> > > would be best...
> > 
> > I will give it a go whenever I get some free time :)
> 
> I fear this has never happened, did it?

I do not think so, I'm still building 4.9.y and 4.14.y and 4.19.y with
gcc8 because of these issues :(

thanks,

greg k-h