[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78f7288e-08bc-41cd-d5b3-668d10903528@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:39:37 +0800
From: maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning
On 2019/8/2 16:10, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 02/08/2019 05.36, Mao Wenan wrote:
>> There are two warings in net/can, fix them by setting bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd
>> and raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd as static.
>>
>> net/can/bcm.c:1683:5: warning: symbol 'bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/can/raw.c:840:5: warning: symbol 'raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Fixes: 473d924d7d46 ("can: fix ioctl function removal")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>
> Thanks Mao!
>
> Btw. what kind of compiler/make switches are you using so that I can see these warnings myself the next time?
>
I use ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-gnu- .
> Best regards,
> Oliver
>
>> ---
>> net/can/bcm.c | 2 +-
>> net/can/raw.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
>> index bf1d0bbecec8..b8a32b4ac368 100644
>> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
>> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
>> @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ static int bcm_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
>> return size;
>> }
>> -int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> +static int bcm_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> /* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
>> diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
>> index da386f1fa815..a01848ff9b12 100644
>> --- a/net/can/raw.c
>> +++ b/net/can/raw.c
>> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int raw_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
>> return size;
>> }
>> -int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> +static int raw_sock_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> /* no ioctls for socket layer -> hand it down to NIC layer */
>>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists