lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190802092102.565055165@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  2 Aug 2019 11:39:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 09/25] binder: fix possible UAF when freeing buffer

From: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>

commit a370003cc301d4361bae20c9ef615f89bf8d1e8a upstream.

There is a race between the binder driver cleaning
up a completed transaction via binder_free_transaction()
and a user calling binder_ioctl(BC_FREE_BUFFER) to
release a buffer. It doesn't matter which is first but
they need to be protected against running concurrently
which can result in a UAF.

Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>



---
 drivers/android/binder.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -1903,8 +1903,18 @@ static struct binder_thread *binder_get_
 
 static void binder_free_transaction(struct binder_transaction *t)
 {
-	if (t->buffer)
-		t->buffer->transaction = NULL;
+	struct binder_proc *target_proc = t->to_proc;
+
+	if (target_proc) {
+		binder_inner_proc_lock(target_proc);
+		if (t->buffer)
+			t->buffer->transaction = NULL;
+		binder_inner_proc_unlock(target_proc);
+	}
+	/*
+	 * If the transaction has no target_proc, then
+	 * t->buffer->transaction has already been cleared.
+	 */
 	kfree(t);
 	binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_TRANSACTION);
 }
@@ -3426,10 +3436,12 @@ static int binder_thread_write(struct bi
 				     buffer->debug_id,
 				     buffer->transaction ? "active" : "finished");
 
+			binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
 			if (buffer->transaction) {
 				buffer->transaction->buffer = NULL;
 				buffer->transaction = NULL;
 			}
+			binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 			if (buffer->async_transaction && buffer->target_node) {
 				struct binder_node *buf_node;
 				struct binder_work *w;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ