[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190802104628.8410-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:46:28 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: fix equation in comment
scale_irq_capacity() call in schedutil_cpu_util() does
util *= (max - irq)
util /= max
But the comment says
util *= (1 - irq)
util /= max
Fix the comment to match what the scaling function does.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 636ca6f88c8e..e127d89d5974 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -259,9 +259,9 @@ unsigned long schedutil_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
* irq metric. Because IRQ/steal time is hidden from the task clock we
* need to scale the task numbers:
*
- * 1 - irq
- * U' = irq + ------- * U
- * max
+ * max - irq
+ * U' = irq + --------- * U
+ * max
*/
util = scale_irq_capacity(util, irq, max);
util += irq;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists