[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908030219420.112263@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 02:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...roid.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: Fix slab walking for init_on_free
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Laura Abbott wrote:
> To properly clear the slab on free with slab_want_init_on_free,
> we walk the list of free objects using get_freepointer/set_freepointer.
> The value we get from get_freepointer may not be valid. This
> isn't an issue since an actual value will get written later
> but this means there's a chance of triggering a bug if we use
> this value with set_freepointer:
>
> [ 4.478342] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:306!
> [ 4.482437] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT PTI
> [ 4.485750] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.2.0-05754-g6471384a #4
> [ 4.490635] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x58a/0x5c0
> [ 4.493679] Code: 48 83 05 78 37 51 02 01 0f 0b 48 83 05 7e 37 51 02 01 48 83 05 7e 37 51 02 01 48 83 05 7e 37 51 02 01 48 83 05 d6 37 51 02 01 <0f> 0b 48 83 05 d4 37 51 02 01 48 83 05 d4 37 51 02 01 48 83 05 d4
> [ 4.506827] RSP: 0000:ffffffff82603d90 EFLAGS: 00010002
> [ 4.510475] RAX: ffff8c3976c04320 RBX: ffff8c3976c04300 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 4.515420] RDX: ffff8c3976c04300 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8c3976c04320
> [ 4.520331] RBP: ffffffff82603db8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 4.525288] R10: ffff8c3976c04320 R11: ffffffff8289e1e0 R12: ffffd52cc8db0100
> [ 4.530180] R13: ffff8c3976c01a00 R14: ffffffff810f10d4 R15: ffff8c3976c04300
> [ 4.535079] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff8266b000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 4.540628] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 4.544593] CR2: ffff8c397ffff000 CR3: 0000000125020000 CR4: 00000000000406b0
> [ 4.549558] Call Trace:
> [ 4.551266] apply_wqattrs_prepare+0x154/0x280
> [ 4.554357] apply_workqueue_attrs_locked+0x4e/0xe0
> [ 4.557728] apply_workqueue_attrs+0x36/0x60
> [ 4.560654] alloc_workqueue+0x25a/0x6d0
> [ 4.563381] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1e3/0x500
> [ 4.566628] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x44/0x3f0
> [ 4.569875] workqueue_init_early+0x246/0x348
> [ 4.573025] start_kernel+0x3c7/0x7ec
> [ 4.575558] x86_64_start_reservations+0x40/0x49
> [ 4.578738] x86_64_start_kernel+0xda/0xe4
> [ 4.581600] secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0
> [ 4.584473] Modules linked in:
> [ 4.586620] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]---
>
> Fix this by ensuring the value we set with set_freepointer is either NULL
> or another value in the chain.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists