[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190805145813.GB972@tardis>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 22:58:13 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com, bristot@...hat.com,
longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/percpu_rwsem: Rewrite to not use rwsem
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 10:43:18PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:02:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> > {
> > + rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
> > +
> > preempt_disable();
> > /*
> > * Same as in percpu_down_read().
> > */
> > - if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
> > + if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss))) {
> > __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
> > - else
> > - __percpu_up_read(sem); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
> > - preempt_enable();
> > + preempt_enable();
> > + return;
> > + }
> >
> > - rwsem_release(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
>
> Missing a preempt_enable() here?
>
Ah.. you modified the semantics of __percpu_up_read() to imply a
preempt_enable(), sorry for the noise...
Regards,
Boqun
> Regards,
> Boqun
>
> > + __percpu_up_read(sem); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
> > }
> >
> [...]
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists