[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190805155153.11021-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:51:53 +0200
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, patchwork-lst@...gutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH] dma-direct: don't truncate dma_required_mask to bus addressing capabilities
The dma required_mask needs to reflect the actual addressing capabilities
needed to handle the whole system RAM. When truncated down to the bus
addressing capabilities dma_addressing_limited() will incorrectly signal
no limitations for devices which are restricted by the bus_dma_mask.
Fixes: b4ebe6063204 (dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask handling)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 59bdceea3737..7ba3480fc546 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
{
u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (dev->bus_dma_mask && dev->bus_dma_mask < max_dma)
- max_dma = dev->bus_dma_mask;
-
return (1ULL << (fls64(max_dma) - 1)) * 2 - 1;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists