lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190805155153.11021-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon,  5 Aug 2019 17:51:53 +0200
From:   Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, patchwork-lst@...gutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH] dma-direct: don't truncate dma_required_mask to bus addressing capabilities

The dma required_mask needs to reflect the actual addressing capabilities
needed to handle the whole system RAM. When truncated down to the bus
addressing capabilities dma_addressing_limited() will incorrectly signal
no limitations for devices which are restricted by the bus_dma_mask.

Fixes: b4ebe6063204 (dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask handling)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
---
 kernel/dma/direct.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 59bdceea3737..7ba3480fc546 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
 {
 	u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT);
 
-	if (dev->bus_dma_mask && dev->bus_dma_mask < max_dma)
-		max_dma = dev->bus_dma_mask;
-
 	return (1ULL << (fls64(max_dma) - 1)) * 2 - 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ