linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: remove kvm_arch_has_vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190805160033.GB28004@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:00:33 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Radim Krm <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: remove kvm_arch_has_vcpu_debugfs()

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 05:48:15PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/08/19 17:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 08:23:25AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 31/07/19 20:55, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> There is no need for this function as all arches have to implement
> >>> kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs() no matter what, so just remove this call
> >>> as it is pointless.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> >>> Cc: "Radim Krm" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> >>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> >>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> >>> Cc: <x86@...nel.org>
> >>> Cc: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: new patch in the series
> >>
> >> Let's remove kvm_arch_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs too for non-x86 arches.
> >>
> >> I'll queue your 2/2.
> > 
> > Great, so what about 1/2?  I have no objection to your patch for this.
> 
> I'll queue my own replacement of 1/2, together with your 2/2.  Both
> should reach Linus later this week.

Wonderful, thanks.

greg k-h