linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] nvme-pci: Support shared tags across queues for Apple 2018 controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f34af208-2707-f326-0451-354a8b482586@grimberg.me>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:56:29 -0700
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:     Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Pawlowski <paul@...rm.io>,
        Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvme-pci: Support shared tags across queues for Apple
 2018 controllers


>>>> Ping ? I had another look today and I don't feel like mucking around
>>>> with all the AQ size logic, AEN magic tag etc... just for that sake of
>>>> that Apple gunk. I'm happy to have it give up IO tags, it doesn't seem
>>>> to make much of a difference in practice anyway.
>>>>
>>>> But if you feel strongly about it, then I'll implement the "proper" way
>>>> sometimes this week, adding a way to shrink the AQ down to something
>>>> like 3 (one admin request, one async event (AEN), and the empty slot)
>>>> by making a bunch of the constants involved variables instead.
>>>
>>> I don't feel too strongly about it. I think your patch is fine, so
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
>>
>> Should we pick this up for 5.3-rc?
> 
> No, it's not a regression fix. Queue it up for 5.4 instead.

OK, will queue it up for nvme-5.4