[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190805201847.GA31714@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 22:18:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/42] 4.9.188-stable review
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:11:01PM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.188 release.
>
> Peter Zijlstra's "x86/atomic: Fix smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()"
> upstream commit 69d927bba39517d0980462efc051875b7f4db185 seems to
> be missing/lost from 4.9 and older stable kernels.
>
> That patch has 10 hunks, first one of those does not apply cleanly to
> 4.9 kernel because it attempts to modify Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> file which does not exist in older kernels. Other 9 hunks apply with
> small offsets and fuzz, but modifications find their correct places anyway.
> Those other 9 hunks are the important ones, first hunk can be ignored.
>
> Greg,
> Please take Peter Zijlstra's original patch and "force" apply it like this
> to 4.9 kernels:
>
> patch -p1 -f <ORIGINAL.patch
>
> and for 4.4 kernels like this:
>
> cat ORIGINAL.patch | sed -e 's/__smp_mb__/smp_mb__/' | patch -p1 -f -l
Can you send properly backported and tested patches?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists