| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:33:32 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Take MUX usage into account
sob., 3 sie 2019 o 15:34 Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com> napisał(a):
>
> From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
>
> The user space like gpioinfo only see the GPIO usage but not the
> MUX usage (e.g. I2C or SPI usage) of a pin. As a user we want to know which
> pin is free/safe to use. So take the MUX usage of strict pinmux controllers
> into account to get a more realistic view for ioctl GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> Tested-By: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
> ---
> Sending Stefan's RFC as patch, as I tested it and it seems to work,
> additionally, an accompanying fix was made by me to gpiolibd to fix a
> display error of the actual result:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1139923/
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h | 6 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index e013d417a936..2fd9eee0b98c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1082,7 +1082,8 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> test_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags) ||
> test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags) ||
> test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags) ||
> - test_bit(FLAG_SYSFS, &desc->flags))
> + test_bit(FLAG_SYSFS, &desc->flags) ||
> + pinctrl_gpio_is_in_use(chip->base + lineinfo.line_offset))
> lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_KERNEL;
> if (test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags))
> lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_IS_OUT;
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> index a64849a9d1b0..0dd00c175eed 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> @@ -759,6 +759,29 @@ int pinctrl_get_group_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +bool pinctrl_gpio_is_in_use(unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
> + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
> + bool result;
> + int pin;
> +
> + if (pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(gpio, &pctldev, &range))
> + return false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pctldev->mutex);
> +
> + /* Convert to the pin controllers number space */
> + pin = gpio_to_pin(range, gpio);
> +
> + result = pinmux_is_in_use(pctldev, pin);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pctldev->mutex);
> +
> + return result;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_gpio_is_in_use);
> +
> /**
> * pinctrl_gpio_request() - request a single pin to be used as GPIO
> * @gpio: the GPIO pin number from the GPIO subsystem number space
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
> index 020e54f843f9..02d2751a4884 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,24 @@ int pinmux_validate_map(const struct pinctrl_map *map, int i)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +bool pinmux_is_in_use(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin)
> +{
> + struct pin_desc *desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin);
> + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops;
> +
> + if (!desc) {
> + dev_err(pctldev->dev,
> + "pin %u is not registered so it cannot be requested\n",
> + pin);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (ops->strict && desc->mux_usecount)
> + return true;
> +
> + return ops->strict && !!desc->gpio_owner;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * pin_request() - request a single pin to be muxed in, typically for GPIO
> * @pin: the pin number in the global pin space
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
> index 794cb3a003ff..24ae61136803 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ int pinmux_check_ops(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev);
>
> int pinmux_validate_map(const struct pinctrl_map *map, int i);
>
> +bool pinmux_is_in_use(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin);
> +
> int pinmux_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
> unsigned pin, unsigned gpio);
> @@ -42,6 +44,11 @@ static inline int pinmux_validate_map(const struct pinctrl_map *map, int i)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline bool pinmux_is_in_use(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline int pinmux_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
> unsigned pin, unsigned gpio)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h
> index 86720a5a384f..d26826b057a1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct device;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
>
> /* External interface to pin control */
> +extern bool pinctrl_gpio_is_in_use(unsigned gpio);
> extern int pinctrl_gpio_request(unsigned gpio);
> extern void pinctrl_gpio_free(unsigned gpio);
> extern int pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio);
> @@ -61,6 +62,11 @@ static inline int pinctrl_pm_select_idle_state(struct device *dev)
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_PINCTRL */
>
> +static inline bool pinctrl_gpio_is_in_use(unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int pinctrl_gpio_request(unsigned gpio)
> {
> return 0;
> --
> 2.22.0
>
Looks good to me.
Linus: do you see any issues with that? If not, I can pick it up.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists