[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ0OYt4q3a=kEWswKZ0z779aDFNg8wbm9Tqa+ddgiW3dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:10:56 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Hennie Muller <hm@...labs.co.za>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] gpio: Explicitly cast from __be16 to unsigned short
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 2:53 PM Hennie Muller <hm@...labs.co.za> wrote:
> cpu_to_be16 returns a __be16 value. This does not break anything
> but does cause sparse to generate unnecessary warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hennie Muller <hm@...labs.co.za>
(...)
> - gbmsg->val = cpu_to_be16(dir << offset);
> - gbmsg->mask = cpu_to_be16(0x0001 << offset);
> + gbmsg->val = (__force u16)cpu_to_be16(dir << offset);
> + gbmsg->mask = (__force u16)cpu_to_be16(0x0001 << offset);
Ugh I don't understand this.
Arnd: you know this better than me: is this the right thing to do
to get rid of sparse warnings from the code?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists