linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH/RFC 07/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual link panels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:12:34 +0000
From:   Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC 07/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual link
 panels

Hi Laurent,

Thank you for your feedback!

> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Sent: 02 August 2019 09:20
> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 07/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual link panels
> 
> Hi Fabrizio,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:34:04AM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > If the display comes with two ports, assume it supports dual
> > link.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > index 2d54ae5..97c51c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > @@ -751,6 +751,9 @@ static int rcar_lvds_parse_dt(struct rcar_lvds *lvds)
> >  			ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >  			goto done;
> >  		}
> > +		if (lvds->info->quirks & RCAR_LVDS_QUIRK_DUAL_LINK)
> > +			lvds->dual_link = of_graph_get_endpoint_count(remote)
> > +					== 2;
> 
> This is a bit of a hack, as I think the information should be queried
> from the panel, like we do for bridges. I'd say we can live with this
> for now, but as the data swap flag should come from the panel as well,
> we will need infrastructure for that, and we can as well through the
> dual link flag there at the same time.

I totally agree, this is a nasty hack, my series is missing the infrastructure
for describing this information

> 
> I think we should use the drm_bridge_timings structure for this purpose,
> as it would make life more difficult for users of drm_bridge and
> drm_panel to have two different structures (especially when wrapping a
> drm_panel with drm_panel_bridge_add()). The structure could be renamed
> if desired.

I am not too sure using drm_bridge_timings for panels would make everybody
happy? Is there any alternative? Perhaps this calls for a new struct we could
embed in both drm_bridge_timings and some drm_panel_<whatever> data
structure?

Thanks,
Fab
 
> 
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (lvds->dual_link) {
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart