linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH/RFC 09/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Fix companion's mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TY1PR01MB1770B1CB1BBCEA0B7139DA87C0DA0@TY1PR01MB1770.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:15:42 +0000
From:   Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC 09/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Fix companion's mode

Hi Laurent,

Thank you for your feedback!

> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Sent: 02 August 2019 09:26
> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 09/12] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Fix companion's mode
> 
> Hi Fabrizio,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:34:06AM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> > The companion encoder needs to be told to use the same
> > mode as the primary encoder.
> >
> > Fixes: e9e8798ab7b8 ("drm: rcar-du: lvds: Add support for dual-link mode")
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > index edd63f5..7944ae9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds.c
> > @@ -415,8 +415,12 @@ static void rcar_lvds_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >  		return;
> >
> >  	/* Enable the companion LVDS encoder in dual-link mode. */
> > -	if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion)
> > +	if (lvds->dual_link && lvds->companion) {
> > +		struct rcar_lvds *companion_lvds = bridge_to_rcar_lvds(
> > +							lvds->companion);
> > +		companion_lvds->mode = lvds->mode;
> >  		lvds->companion->funcs->enable(lvds->companion);
> > +	}
> 
> Would it make sense to do this in rcar_lvds_mode_set() instead, to keep
> the mode set code grouped in a single place ?

I need to looks into this, as the initialization of lvds1 is a bit special.
I'll get back to you.

Thanks,
Fab

> 
> >
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Hardcode the channels and control signals routing for now.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart