[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190805124933.610345569@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:03:17 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 52/53] gcc-9: properly declare the {pv,hv}clock_page storage
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
commit 459e3a21535ae3c7a9a123650e54f5c882b8fcbf upstream.
The pvlock_page and hvclock_page variables are (as the name implies)
addresses to pages, created by the linker script.
But we declared them as just "extern u8" variables, which _works_, but
now that gcc does some more bounds checking, it causes warnings like
warning: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of ‘u8[1]’
when we then access more than one byte from those variables.
Fix this by simply making the declaration of the variables match
reality, which makes the compiler happy too.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ extern int __vdso_gettimeofday(struct ti
extern time_t __vdso_time(time_t *t);
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
-extern u8 pvclock_page
+extern u8 pvclock_page[PAGE_SIZE]
__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE
-extern u8 hvclock_page
+extern u8 hvclock_page[PAGE_SIZE]
__attribute__((visibility("hidden")));
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists