[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190805131306.GQ2640@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:13:06 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Do not disable interrupt twice on
suspend
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:53:06PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:50:50PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > @@ -313,10 +332,12 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver hpdriver_portdrv = {
> > .remove = pciehp_remove,
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > .suspend = pciehp_suspend,
> > .resume_noirq = pciehp_resume_noirq,
> > +#endif
> > .resume = pciehp_resume,
> > - .runtime_suspend = pciehp_suspend,
> > + .runtime_suspend = pciehp_runtime_suspend,
> > .runtime_resume = pciehp_runtime_resume,
> > #endif /* PM */
> > };
>
> Hm, why isn't ".resume" part of the "#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP" section?
Good point. I'll move it there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists