[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190805045442.3pnaawo4nlrieoie@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:24:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: fix equation in comment
On 02-08-19, 11:46, Qais Yousef wrote:
> scale_irq_capacity() call in schedutil_cpu_util() does
>
> util *= (max - irq)
> util /= max
>
> But the comment says
>
> util *= (1 - irq)
> util /= max
>
> Fix the comment to match what the scaling function does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 636ca6f88c8e..e127d89d5974 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -259,9 +259,9 @@ unsigned long schedutil_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
> * irq metric. Because IRQ/steal time is hidden from the task clock we
> * need to scale the task numbers:
> *
> - * 1 - irq
> - * U' = irq + ------- * U
> - * max
> + * max - irq
> + * U' = irq + --------- * U
> + * max
> */
> util = scale_irq_capacity(util, irq, max);
> util += irq;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists