linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the integrity tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190806134530.747d155e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:45:30 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the integrity tree

Hi Thiago,

On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:18:06 -0300 Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the trouble. I wasn't aware of that build time check.
> I'll enable HEADER_TEST and KERNEL_HEADER_TEST for my next patches.

I do allmodconfig builds which enable those.

> Thanks for providing the fix. Should I post a new version or can Mimi
> squash the above into the original patch?

Up to Mimi, but either works (or just committing my patch if the tree is
normally not rebased).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped