[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190806042440.16445-1-daniel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:24:39 +1000
From: Daniel Black <daniel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Daniel Black <daniel@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org (open list:ACPI),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] acpi/hmat: ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID is deprecated in ACPI-6.3
ACPI-6.3 corresponds to when hmat revision was bumped from
1 to 2. In this version ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID was
deprecated and made reserved.
As such in revision 2+ we shouldn't be testing this flag.
This is as per ACPI-6.3, 5.2.27.3, Table 5-145
"Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure"
for Flags.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Black <daniel@...ux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
index 96b7d39a97c6..e938e34673d9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade
pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%d Memory Domain:%d\n",
p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD);
- if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) {
+ if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) {
target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD);
if (!target) {
pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n");
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists