[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmBeB1BezsGh=cK=U9m8goKzZnngDRzNM7B1voZfh8yWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 15:37:42 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>,
Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@...el.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] iwlwifi: dbg: work around clang bug by marking
debug strings static
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:11 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
>
> > Luca, you said this was already fixed in your internal tree, and the fix
> > would appear soon in next, but I don't see anything in linux-next?
>
> Luca is still on vacation, but I just sent out a version of the patch we
> had applied internally.
>
> Also turns out it wasn't actually _fixed_, just _moved_, so those
> internal patches wouldn't have helped anyway.
Thanks for the report. Do you have a link?
I'll rebase my patch then.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists