lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190806224210.GA3337@khorivan>
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 01:42:12 +0300
From:   Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     vinicius.gomes@...el.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: sch_taprio: fix memleak in error path for
 sched list parse

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:41:14AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>Date: Tue,  6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
>
>> Based on net/master
>
>I wonder about that because:
Applies cleanly on net/master, but line num is not correct.
I've sent v2.

>
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> @@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
>>  	spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
>>
>>  free_sched:
>> -	kfree(new_admin);
>> +	if (new_admin)
>> +		call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
>>
>>  	return err;
>
>In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
>
>	nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
>
>done:
>	rcu_read_unlock();
>
>	return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
>
>
>which is part of function taprio_dump().
>
>Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ