[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190806224210.GA3337@khorivan>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 01:42:12 +0300
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: vinicius.gomes@...el.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: sch_taprio: fix memleak in error path for
sched list parse
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:41:14AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
>
>> Based on net/master
>
>I wonder about that because:
Applies cleanly on net/master, but line num is not correct.
I've sent v2.
>
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> @@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
>> spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
>>
>> free_sched:
>> - kfree(new_admin);
>> + if (new_admin)
>> + call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
>>
>> return err;
>
>In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
>
> nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
>
>done:
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
>
>
>which is part of function taprio_dump().
>
>Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists