[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190806064347.GA14906@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 08:43:47 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops
Hi Lu,
I really do like the switch to the per-device dma_map_ops, but:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:01:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Current Intel IOMMU driver sets the system level dma_ops. This
> implementation has at least the following drawbacks: 1) each
> dma API will go through the IOMMU driver even the devices are
> using identity mapped domains; 2) if user requests to use an
> identity mapped domain (a.k.a. bypass iommu translation), the
> driver might fall back to dma domain blindly if the device is
> not able to address all system memory.
This is very clearly a behavioral regression. The intel-iommu driver
has always used the iommu mapping to provide decent support for
devices that do not have the full 64-bit addressing capability, and
changing this will make a lot of existing setups go slower.
I don't think having to use swiotlb for these devices helps anyone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists