[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce952e3f8d927cdbccb268d708b4e47179d69b06.camel@analog.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 07:11:57 +0000
From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] net: phy: adin: add ethtool get_stats support
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 17:28 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> [External]
>
> > +struct adin_hw_stat {
> > + const char *string;
> > +static void adin_get_strings(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 *data)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adin_hw_stats); i++) {
> > + memcpy(data + i * ETH_GSTRING_LEN,
> > + adin_hw_stats[i].string, ETH_GSTRING_LEN);
>
> You define string as a char *. So it will be only as long as it should
> be. However memcpy always copies ETH_GSTRING_LEN bytes, doing off the
> end of the string and into whatever follows.
>
hmm, will use strlcpy()
i blindedly copied memcpy() from some other driver
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int adin_read_mmd_stat_regs(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > + struct adin_hw_stat *stat,
> > + u32 *val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, stat->reg1);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *val = (ret & 0xffff);
> > +
> > + if (stat->reg2 == 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, stat->reg2);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *val <<= 16;
> > + *val |= (ret & 0xffff);
>
> Does the hardware have a snapshot feature? Is there a danger that
> between the two reads stat->reg1 rolls over and you end up with too
> big a value?
i'm afraid i don't understand about the snapshot feature you are mentioning;
i.e. i don't remember seeing it in other chips;
regarding the danger that stat->reg1 rolls over, i guess that is possible, but it's a bit hard to guard against;
i guess if it ends up in that scenario, [for many counters] things would be horribly bad, and the chip, or cabling would
be unusable;
not sure if this answer is sufficient/satisfactory;
thanks
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists