[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1565076756-71682-1-git-send-email-chenzefeng2@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 15:32:36 +0800
From: chenzefeng <chenzefeng2@...wei.com>
To: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <allison@...utok.net>, <jeyu@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
<chenzefeng2@...wei.com>, <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm:unwind: fix backtrace error with unwind_table
For arm, when load_module success, the mod->init_layout.base would
be free in function do_free_init, but do not remove it's unwind table
from the unwind_tables' list. And later the above mod->init_layout.base
would alloc for another module's text section, and add to the
unwind_tables which cause one address can found more than two unwind table
in the unwind_tables' list, therefore may get to errror unwind table to
backtrace, and get an error backtrace.
Signed-off-by: chenzefeng <chenzefeng2@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/module.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
index deef17f..a4eb5f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
@@ -403,14 +403,24 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf32_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
return 0;
}
-void
-module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
-{
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
+void module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
+{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARM_SEC_MAX; i++)
- if (mod->arch.unwind[i])
+ if (mod->arch.unwind[i]) {
unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[i]);
-#endif
+ mod->arch.unwind[i] = NULL;
+ }
}
+
+void module_arch_freeing_init(struct module *mod)
+{
+ if (mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT]) {
+ unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT]);
+ mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT] = NULL;
+ }
+}
+#endif
--
1.8.5.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists