linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: snic: remove redundant assignment to variable ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190806131721.GI1974@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:17:21 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@...co.com>,
        Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@...co.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: snic: remove redundant assignment to variable ret

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:49:50PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Variable ret is being assigned with a value that is never read as
> there is return statement immediately afterwards.  The assignment
> is redundant and hence can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/snic/snic_disc.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_disc.c
> index e9ccfb97773f..d89c75991323 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_disc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_disc.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ snic_tgt_create(struct snic *snic, struct snic_tgt_id *tgtid)
>  	tgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*tgt), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!tgt) {
>  		SNIC_HOST_ERR(snic->shost, "Failure to allocate snic_tgt.\n");
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -
>  		return tgt;

Not related to this patch, but it would be nicer to return NULL instead
of tgt.  It's the same but the literal is nicer.  No need for the error
message after a kmalloc failure either.

	tgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*tgt), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!tgt)
		return NULL;

regards,
dan carpenter