linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:27:09 +0300
From:   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Sweeney, Sean" <seansw@....qualcomm.com>,
        David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects

On 7/30/19 05:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29-07-19, 13:16, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> Sibi might be working on doing that for the SDM845 CPUfreq driver.
>> Georgi could also change his GPU driver use case to use this BW OPP
>> table and required-opps.
>>
>> The problem is that people don't want to start using this until we
>> decide on the DT representation. So it's like a chicken and egg
>> situation.
> 
> Yeah, I agree to that.
> 
> @Georgi and @Sibi: This is your chance to speak up about the proposal
> from Saravana and if you find anything wrong with them. And specially
> that it is mostly about interconnects here, I would like to have an
> explicit Ack from Georgi on this.
> 
> And if you guys are all okay about this then please at least commit
> that you will convert your stuff based on this in coming days.

Looks fine to me. I am already doing some testing with this patchset.
However, as Stephen already pointed out, we should s/KBps/kBps/.

Thanks,
Georgi