[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190806154658.GC20422@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:46:58 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] net: phy: adin: add ethtool get_stats support
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:11:57AM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 17:28 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > [External]
> >
> > > +struct adin_hw_stat {
> > > + const char *string;
> > > +static void adin_get_strings(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 *data)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adin_hw_stats); i++) {
> > > + memcpy(data + i * ETH_GSTRING_LEN,
> > > + adin_hw_stats[i].string, ETH_GSTRING_LEN);
> >
> > You define string as a char *. So it will be only as long as it should
> > be. However memcpy always copies ETH_GSTRING_LEN bytes, doing off the
> > end of the string and into whatever follows.
> >
>
> hmm, will use strlcpy()
> i blindedly copied memcpy() from some other driver
Hopefully that driver used const char string[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]. Then a
memcpy is safe. If not, please let me know what driver you copied.
> i'm afraid i don't understand about the snapshot feature you are mentioning;
> i.e. i don't remember seeing it in other chips;
It is frequency done at the MAC layer for statistics. You tell the
hardware to snapshot all the statistics. It atomically makes a copy of
all the statistics into a set of registers. These values are then
static, and consistent between counters. You can read them out knowing
they are not going to change.
> regarding the danger that stat->reg1 rolls over, i guess that is
> possible, but it's a bit hard to guard against;
The normal solution is the read the MSB, the LSB and then the MSB
again. If the MSB value has changed between the two reads, you know a
roll over has happened, and you need to do it all again.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists