linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Decouple checker from generic ARM CPUidle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190806155407.GC16546@e107155-lin>
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:54:07 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Decouple checker from
 generic ARM CPUidle

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The PSCI checker currently relies on the generic ARM CPUidle
> infrastructure to enter an idle state, which in turn creates
> a dependency that is not really needed.
> 
> The PSCI checker code to test PSCI CPU suspend is built on
> top of the CPUidle framework and can easily reuse the
> struct cpuidle_state.enter() function (previously initialized
> by an idle driver, with a PSCI back-end) to trigger an entry
> into an idle state, decoupling the PSCI checker from the
> generic ARM CPUidle infrastructure and simplyfing the code
> in the process.
> 
> Convert the PSCI checker suspend entry function to use
> the struct cpuidle_state.enter() function callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Not sure why we didn't take this path from the beginning.
Anyways make sense and much needed for later patches in the series.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep