linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] x86/CPU: Expose if cache is inclusive of lower level caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:33:33 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        kuo-lang.tseng@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] x86/CPU: Expose if cache is inclusive of lower
 level caches

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:13:22AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Some platforms being enabled in this round have SKUs with inclusive
> cache and also SKUs with non-inclusive cache. The non-inclusive cache
> SKUs do not support cache pseudo-locking and cannot be made to support
> cache pseudo-locking with software changes. Needing to know if cache is
> inclusive or not will thus remain a requirement to distinguish between
> these different SKUs. Supporting cache pseudo-locking on platforms with
> non inclusive cache will require new hardware features.

Is there another way/CPUID bit or whatever to tell us whether the
platform supports cache pseudo-locking or is the cache inclusivity the
only one?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.