[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1565118415.2401.113.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:06:55 -0700
From: Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
megha.dey@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 RESEND 3/6] x86: Introduce the dynamic teardown function
On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 10:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Megha,
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Megha Dey wrote:
> >
> >
> > +void default_teardown_msi_irqs_grp(struct pci_dev *dev, int
> > group_id)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct msi_desc *entry;
> > +
> > + for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
> > + if (entry->group_id == group_id && entry->irq) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++)
> > + arch_teardown_msi_irq(entry->irq +
> > i);
> With proper group management this whole group_id muck goes away. You
> hand
> in a group and clean it up and if done right then you don't need a
> new
> interface at all simply because everything is group based.
>
Yeah , with the new proposal, this will hopefully be much cleaner.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists