[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae26ad74-3506-6074-8024-2ff9bc1003aa@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 05:48:13 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <vigneshr@...com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>
CC: <marek.vasut@...il.com>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<tmaimon77@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework hwcaps selection for the
spi-mem case
On 08/06/2019 08:10 AM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> +static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
> + struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + /*
> + * First test with 4 address bytes. The opcode itself might
> + * be a 3B addressing opcode but we don't care, because
> + * SPI controller implementation should not check the opcode,
> + * but just the sequence.
> + */
> + op->addr.nbytes = 4;
> + if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) {
> + /* If flash size <16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */
> + if (nor->mtd.size <= SZ_16M) {
> + op->addr.nbytes = 3;
> + if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op))
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
We can get rid of a level of indentation by writing it as:
static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
struct spi_mem_op *op)
{
op->addr.nbytes = 4;
if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) {
if (nor->mtd.size > SZ_16M)
return -ENOTSUPP;
/* If flash size <16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */
op->addr.nbytes = 3;
if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op))
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
}
I'll do this by myself when applying, no need to resubmit.
Thanks, Vignesh!
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists