[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190807063002.GG6627@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:30:02 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] i915: convert to new mount API
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 12:50:10AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Though personally I'm averse to managing "f"objects through
> "m"interfaces, which can get ridiculous (notably, MADV_HUGEPAGE works
> on the virtual address of a mapping, but the huge-or-not alignment of
> that mapping must have been decided previously). In Google we do use
> fcntls F_HUGEPAGE and F_NOHUGEPAGE to override on a per-file basis -
> one day I'll get to upstreaming those.
Such an interface seems very useful, although the two fcntls seem a bit
odd.
But I think the point here is that the i915 has its own somewhat odd
instance of tmpfs. If we could pass the equivalent of the huge=*
options to shmem_file_setup all that garbage (including the
shmem_file_setup_with_mnt function) could go away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists